Posts

The Green New Deal: A Carbon Tax For Socialists

 

Posted by Helena Glass (Click for author profile.)

 

Ocasio-Cortez has stated that mankind will be vanquished in 12 years. 

 

Her New Green Deal has a time frame of 10 years to implement assuming it starts – today.   In the EU, they continue to establish time frames reaching emission goals extending to 2050 – 31 years in the future.   China really doesn’t give a rat’s arse, they just agree to whatever proposal is put forth, sign on the dotted line, and then refuse to actually comply.  

 

What makes the Green New Deal so ridiculous is that it only applies to the US.  

 

So the rest of the world will keep producing their climate change pollution, push out their goals 31 years in the future, and we’ll all be Socially broke or dead.

The Green New Deal states that the US will be the major exporter of Green technology, expertise, products, and services.  But according to her calculations, there would be no one left to export to because they missed the train and did nothing – so they would be dead.

 

Who wrote the Green New Deal?

 

The Media would have us believe that Ocasio-Cortez was the author.  However, her acumen would beg to differ.  In fact, Ed Markay, who is listed as ‘co-author’, is likely the frontrunner.  However, given the world of politics, I imagine they both had the help of some powerful prompters who hired the best writers to create this monstrosity.

 

What is not so headlined is the fact that the Green Deal calls for the implementation of the “social cost of carbon”…

 

which is essentially a tax first introduced by Obama.   It is basically the same ‘tax’ that disproportionally affects low income workers and resulted in the Yellow Vest Movement in France.  Not working too well.

 

The basic concept of a carbon tax is that the increased cost will incentivize industries to find ways to pollute less, and incentivize citizens to stay home more and conserve.

 

A number of economists feel this tax will lower emissions while creating more jobs.  But there is absolutely no correlative proof that a carbon tax creates jobs…and despite its implementation in France and Germany, they have failed again to reach their stated goals pushing the date ever further.  What it does provide is revenue for governments to offset deficit spending or divert elsewhere.

 

Today, the Federal and state governments impose excise taxes on gasoline.

 

The federal tax is 18.4cents per gallon, while state taxes vary but range roughly in the 31cent range.   We are already being taxed around 50cents per gallon.   Why isn’t this money spent on ‘green stuff’?

 

Where did this tax originate?

 

The Revenue Act of 1932 incorporated the first oil tax at 1cent per gallon.   The purpose?  To help balance the budget deficit.   Over 86 years the tax has increased by 5000%.  That’s called government spending.

 

According to a report by Science Direct in 2016, $28 billion in carbon revenues are collected each year from 40 different countries.

 

Of that total, 27% is used to subsidize green spending in energy efficiency, the balance is allocated to a general fund and to corporate and individual taxpayers through tax cuts and rebates.   In fact, Sweden, the UK, British Columbia, Mexico, Finland and Iceland spend -0-% on Green Funding.   Australia spends 15%.  Germany and Canada are not mentioned.

 

The point is simplistic. The Socialist Agenda is always ‘how funds should be spent’, rather than ‘how funds are spent’.

 

Which companies reap the reward of the Green Funding?

 

According to a report issued by Friends of Science,;

“Since 1991, the Energy Foundation has been the main instrument that a network of influential U.S. foundations has used to define a portfolio of policy options, political strategies, and energy technologies to address global warming. It was set up by way of large block grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, Pew Charitable Trusts, and MacArthur Foundation, and supported in later years by the Hewlett Foundation, Packard Foundation, and other funders. The Energy Foundation’s principal function is to “leverage money in a highly concentrated pattern on behalf of policies that shift markets, industry, and consumers in the direction of renewable energy technologies and energy efficiency practices.

 

It should come as no surprise that the aforementioned foundations are ALL Liberal, Democrat affiliates.

 

Of course no Green Funding Dark Money scam is complete without highlighting Al Gore.  Between 1999 and 2019, Al Gore managed to amass a personal wealth rivaling Mitt Romney, pegged at over $300 million.  In 1999, his wealth was calculated at roughly $1.5 million all of which was inherited from his family.  His entire fortune was amassed through companies he started that mooched off the global warming scam.

 

And the Paris Climate Accord funds?

 

Those funds are predominantly shifted to spending in Africa whose carbon footprint is -0-.  If in fact Green Funding was Green, it would be spent on those countries whose footprint is the greatest – not the least…

 

When in doubt… follow der money.

 

And lastly, the media cites FDR’s New Deal as a compliment to the Green New Deal.  But FDR’s deal was the impetus that spiraled this country in a forever greater debt, a forever greater welfare, and a forever greater depletion of the middle class.

 

It is also noteworthy that the New Deal was implemented via Executive Order, because it would never have passed Congress.

Read more:  

Conspiracy is reality

In 1986, I was sitting in a diner in a companies compound in Dhahran eating a hamburger. This was a compound that we shared with other “renters”, many of which were American Marine Corps pilots. The Marines had an air wing in Dhahran.

As I was sitting there, on CNN a US senator was carping about the “fact” that Saudi Arabia would not allow our pilots in the country. Congress didn’t know we were there?

What did congress believe McDonald Douglas was doing there?

In the debate over the upcoming sale of AWAC’s reconnaissance planes to Saudi Arabia, no one in congress questioned how 5, $110 million dollar planes could lead to a military expenditure of $5.5 billion. Think about it…

NO ONE IN CONGRESS COULD FIGURE OUT THAT 5.5 x 110 MILLION IS NOT 5 BILLION!!!

The media defines conspiracy

There is too much to even document of what people do not know about US foreign policy. Personally, having lived through it, I have to say, I don’t disagree with it. In my opinion, they keep it secret because the USA has more enemies inside the US than outside. But it what it is. This is why people should believe conspiracy theory.

Foreign policy media is controlled by the CIA

Believe what you will…

For more, click below.

The Purpose Behind Government is to lie. 

 

 

Few people see this. Government’s lie to stay in power.

 

Taxation without representation is tyranny. Lie.

 

How US “Intelligence” creates lies. 

 

The US under the British was a tax haven for British investors. They had the lowest taxes in the Empire.

 

The Civil war was fought to emancipate blacks. Lie.

 

The civil war was fought over US taxes on exported southern cotton. One million blacks, 1/4th of the black population of the south died of starvation after the Civil War. Emancipation was, according to Lincoln, more important than eating.

The Bell Curve, Slavery without chains

John Kennedy was a popular President.

 

Lie. John Kennedy was a total loser. His entire history was invented. (Unless you somehow believe that he never heard a DESTROYER minutes before it slammed into PT 109.) Kennedy put advisors in Vietnam because he was seen as soft on Communism, which led to the fake news Gulf of Tonkin resolution, which led to Johnson’s idiotic escalation of the Vietnam war. Kennedy was in Texas when he was assassinated because he was going to lose the 1964 election.

 

Saddam Hussein had WMD.

 

The bumbling moron John Brennan

 

No one, and I mean NO ONE with an ounce of gray matter thought Saddam was a threat to anything. This is why neither Chirac or Gerhard Schroeder would go along with Bushes war. In fact, the opposite was true. That Saddam was in the front line against Al Qaeda.

 

Osama bin Laden was behind the 911 attacks.

 

So, a guy that was in a CIA built bunker in Afghanistan, that had no access to a bank and lived with goats and sheep was behind 911? They found flight instruction manuals in his compound. That’s right. You can learn to fly a jet FROM A BOOK. And if by utter coincidence, just as the US special forces had him surrounded, Bush pulled the troops and sent them to the above referenced hoax war against Saddam.

 

There is proof that the globe is warming.

 

There is ZERO consensus that the globe is warming Even if there was, no one knows how fast or what contribution CO2 has to it. Even if they did, there isn’t a scientist or economist on the planet that believes there will EVER be a political consensus to stop it.

 

Donald Trump conspired with the Russians to rig the US election.

Lie. All Mueller had to to was a ten minute interview with Cohen and he could have closed his investgation of Trump. The purpose behind the investigation was to cover up Hillary’s crimes.

 

What a fool believes…

 

 

 

If something makes no sense, we should not be afraid to say so. To me, the Bell Curve is the Elitist Deep State in drag. The Bell curve standing alone, makes sense. It just isn’t scientific and it’s not accurate.

 

Why do we keep hearing the words “Ruling Elite?”

 

Since when are democracies run by elites? The United States is, of course, not a democracy, we ‘re a Republic. Democracies have coalition governments. In the US we have winners and losers. But in neither case should we have ruling “elites.”

 

How about Media Elites? How many times have you heard that?

 

Since when are reporters, elite? Reporters are like waiters. They take information from the kitchen to the table. In most of the west, news anchors are referred to as news readers.

 

Look at the above graph. This is the data that’s supposed to prove that people with high IQ’s make more than people with low IQ’s. Do you see any correlation?

 

Yes, for wages below $60,000 but even then, the scatter is so great that it’s meaningless.

 

Do the Soros funded, deep state elites know this? Of course. They could care less.

 

When I was in kindergarten, we were given IQ tests. Those who scored high, (in my school, it was 30 out of 500) were put in a class of hyper achievers. For the first 9 years of my school life, I was coddled, prodded and encouraged because I was “intelligent.” In fact, all high achievers are treated like this. Now look back at the graph.

 

If we’re so smart, why are so many “intelligent” people not high earners?

 

In my opinion, that chart doesn’t show anything other than the simple fact that smart doesn’t mean anything above an IQ of 100!

 

Now, let’s think logically about what a bell curve is. It’s in the shape of a bell. The middle of the bell is average, the left is “dumb” and the right “smart.”

Do you remember taking an IQ test?

 

Of course not, you were probably 8 years old. An IQ test does not test knowledge; that’s an SAT or ACT. An IQ test tests the speed at which a person can figure things out and their ability at pattern recognition. These are left brain logic skills. In other words, the exact skill’s you need TO TAKE TESTS.

 

The idea that people with high IQ’s should be elite comes from college professors.

 

In other words, it makes THEM appear elite. Well, if they’re so elite, why is there no correlation between high IQ and income after IQ’s of 120? An IQ below 120 is, frankly, not that high. If they’re so elite, why are their student’s debt slaves?

 

Now, let’s look at the logic.

 

The world is not filled with test takers. It’s also not filled with consumers, voters of taxpayers. It’s filled with people. Humans did not evolve as individuals we evolved as groups, and we are petrified of being outside of groups. Ask any kid that’s tall, short, skinny, fat or sick and they’ll tell you, “all I want to be is like everybody else.”

 

In reality, high achievers, whether in academics, sports, politics or any other activity are rare, EVEN AMONG THEIR GENETIC GROUPS.

 

Just because Niels Bohr was a genius, doesn’t mean all Germans are. It just means Bohr was. The rest of the country has IQ’s all over the map, or bell as it were.

 

Do people with low IQ’s have low wages? Absolutely, but remember, low IQ’s, like high IQ’s are RARE. A person with an IQ of 75 is in less than 2% of the population and often lacks basic abilities like simple math and communications problems. These inhibits their ability to function in the group.

 

All the “ruling” elite is, is a self-proclaimed group.

 

A group that thinks they’re above you. Think of all the ways elites LOVE to tell you they’re better than you.

 

  • They don’t eat meat, they’re elite.

  • They love animals, they’re elite.

  • They’re tolerant, you’re a bigot. They’re elite.

  • They’re vegetables are organic, they’re elite.

  • They’re educated, they’re elite.

  • They’re more holy than you, love God more, are more patriotic and care more about stranded puppies.

 

Just look at the elitist standard bearer, Hillary Clinton.

 

Hillary once described Trump supporters as deplorables, a word that “elites” wouldn’t use to describe a dog, but that wasn’t all. She described Bernie Sanders voters as losers who lived in their parent’s basements. Then, she wrapped the whole thing up by saying that she’d have a 50-point lead if voters weren’t so, seemingly, stupid.

 

Has anyone ever seen a politician so ensconced in hate?

 

In my opinion, anyone who doesn’t believe that there was a deep state plot to overthrow the elected President of the United States is either a liar, a politician or a moron.

 

I’d also like to add that anyone who believes that the world isn’t already run by self-appointed, deep state connected elites is hopelessly naive’.

 

These people believe that you are too stupid to vote and therefore they must do it for you.

Now, give another gander at the chart above. It says that there is zero correlation between intelligence and IQ for wages above $60,000 a year in the US. What is $60,000? It’s the average income for the average breadwinner in the US. This is what teachers, firemen, welders, roofers and UPS drivers make. Is it a surprise that average people make average wages? Maybe to an idiot.

 

Is it surprising high IQ people make average or in many cases, below average wages? You bet your ass it is!

 

This destroys the entire narrative, not only of IQ but of elite media, elite government, or elite college professors. Worse for them, it replaces it with those traits they fear the most, like hard word, integrity, honesty, values and commitment. It also replaces it with the thing they are the MOST afraid of.

 

The lions share of the world’s successful people are Christians and more so, Catholics.

 

This is a place they really don’t want to go. People aren’t better people as groups because they’re smart. They’re not less racist, more generous or better suited to lead. The people that do best are not even people “of faith.”

 

The most successful people are RELIGIOUS!

 

Oh, God; did I just say that? But it only makes sense. For people to live in harmony and be successful as societies, they must agree to live under not only laws, but laws that do not need to be enforced. Once laws must be enforced, they don’t work. For “elites” this is where the bell no longer tolls.

 

 

This is why they pass so many thousands of laws that do nothing other than create paperwork.

 

People in religions don’t break laws because they fear excommunication. That’s the big fear. Not incarceration. Germany, Sweden and Switzerland don’t need a million laws. They all agree that to live together, they need to get along with each other.

 

Personally, I find “elites” to be closer to retards than geniuses.

 

I live near them. These people put coats on their dogs, seemingly unaware of what fur is. They buy “fresh vegetables” oblivious of the fact that they are chemically ripened. In our local “elite” newspaper, a 1/8th acre garden was described as a “farm.” They seem unaware that organic pesticides kill bugs.

One particular “animal rescuer” told me that mother birds “teach their young to fly.” In our business incubator, they describe a three-inch tomato plant under a light bulb as “a technology.” One woman who spent two years as an anti-fracking protestor called me and asked me if I could teach her what fracking was. These are the people that think their education makes them elite!

 

Let me share with you one little factoid that is WELL known in the Ivy league brain centers.

 

Things that are true, are worthless in politics. This is why the CIA, and Soros backed NGO’s sponsor such utterly asinine ideas.

 

If your purpose is to divide people, what good is a statement that everybody agrees on? This is why Global Climate Change is a gift from heaven for liberals.

 

Not only is it impossible to prove, it feeds right into their concept of elitism.

 

Anybody that thinks that CO2 emissions are the biggest environmental problem the world has, has never been to China, India, Indonesia, Thailand, Brazil, or Bangladesh. In India alone, 350,000 children die every year from dysentery. They’re literally being poisoned by their own feces. One in five Chinese will die of respiratory failure from soot emissions. In Bangladesh, children work dismantling toxic cell phones and recycling metals.

 

But the fact is, the high IQ elites care more about their dogs than Indian children. (Notice how Andrew Cuomo wants to make plastic bags illegal but not those used for dog shit)

 

The first attacks on the Bell Curve were from teachers. This next attack is from mathematicians like Nassim Talib. They fight the good fight.